Published on July 28, 2016under Articles
There are few tracking challengesas burdenedwith lore and conflicting informationashow to tell a buck from doe.Some common methods I’ve heard suggest that bucks show dewclaws, or drag their feet, others say that buck tracks tend to splay more, and one frequently repeated method states that buck hind tracks tend landtothe insideof the front tracks(due to the narrower hips in males than females).
None of these methods haveworked in my experience. Dewclaws register in soft substrates or when an animal is moving fast, drag marks also tend to be a result of deep snow or sand, splay is also a result of speed and substrate, and theplacement of the hind tracks has more to do with the direction the animal is looking and how it’s moving than the width of its hips.
Splayed tracks of a galloping white-tailed deer.
While it’s probable that early hunter/gather trackers developed methods to tell bucks from does, these skills have largely been lost. It wasn’t until amodern wave of obsessed North American trackers begansharing their experiences and knowledge gained from trackers around the world, that they began to understand how to reliably differentiate sex in deer.
Additionally,the rise of many experttrailers (experts in the art of finding animals by following their tracks; click here to see a list of certified trailers), enabled trackers to test these methods by examining a set oftracks, trying to determine the sex, and then finding the animal to confirm. During the last decade, these trackers have tested a wide variety of methods and adapted them for deer and elk in North America.Rather than write down my understanding of how it’s done, I decided to interview some of the best trailers I know and share their tips with you here:
White-tailed deer front (below) and hind tracks.
Brian is a hunter, tracker, and ultra runner from the Pacific Northwest. He was one of the first CyberTracker trailing evaluators and is widely considered one of the top trailers in the country.
“For deer, elk, and pretty much anything else with a hoof, the front feet are proportionally larger than the hindson mature bucks– though this breaks down with younger animals. In deer, doe front tracks are usually equal or up to 3/16” longer than hind tracks. Usually, if it’s more than 1/4” larger and the tracks seems large compared to the average track in the region, there is about a 90% chance its a buck.”
Briansaid that mature buck tracks are really distinctive and he can’t remember ever following what he thought was a buck that later turned out to be a doe.
“I havefollowed what Ithought was a doe that turned out to be a yearling buck. Behavior and context are reallyimportant clues. If the animal is alone, it may be more likely to be a buck. After the rut, the bucks tend to hang out in really thick, dense terrain. Buck bedding sites also tend to bevery hard to approach when compared to doe beds.”
Preston is an energetic and passionate tracker and hunter currently living in California. When he’s not following a deer, elk, or bear trail, he’s busy with his day job as awildlife biologist.
“Get to know the deer in your specific area. Tracks of mature bucks (over 3 years old) are larger than doe tracks and are oftenobvious just by size. Younger males (1-2 years) are more difficult to tell apart. Bucks also seem to plow through the land and push through brush, while does tend to go around. Bed sites from bucks are usually found in more secure locations such as thick brush or hollow trees.”
Preston also compares front to hind track size, but measures them differently than Brian:
“I measure track width just in front of the halfway point in the track and compare same side of body. Use clear tracks for measuring that are not on top of each other. Doe hind feet often will fill their front tracks, bucks often appear to do a very slight understep due to the hindfootbeingshorter.”
He alsostressed the importance of determining if an animal is alone, and the value of watching deer in your area.
“You cannot look at 50 feet of trail and make a determination if the animal is alone or with a group. You have to follow the trail for a while to be sure of herd demography; sometimes yearling does, does who lost their fawns, or does lower in social hierarchy will travel on the fringe of the herd, and they may appear to be alone for a while, but will join up with the herd, then break away again. It’s important to follow the trail long enough to make a good decision.”
“Watching animals is critical to learning tracking. If you see bucks ordoes, go look at their tracks, you will quickly learn to group sizes of tracks. Secondly, watching animals will teach you about herd demographics as it relates to season and behavior. A strong foundation, especially a first hand understanding, will greatly aid the tracker in their ability to determine what deer are in groups and what deer are alone at different times of the year.”
Casey is a Senior Tracker and Evaluator with CyberTracker. Heisco-author of Bird Feathers, and one of the only full-time professional trackers in the country.
“I rarely look at size difference between front and hind tracks unless it’s a tricky track. I prefer to look for a general size of tracks for does and young bucks in an area and the large bucks tend to stand out. Mature buck tracks just tend to be much larger. I also lookfor groups of deer. Does are often with mixed age groups. During the rut, a buck will hang around the does and followers. When I do measure tracks, I measure both length and width. Front tracks in buck are proportionally much larger than their hinds. Buck beds can be fairly easy to tell from doe beds, they are often larger, deeper and used morerepeatedly.”
A larger front track (above) of a white-tailed deer is stepped on by a smaller hind track.
To recap, the basic idea is that bucks tend to have proportionally larger front versus hind feet than does. Doe front tracks on the other hand tend to be justslightly larger or nearlythe same size as theirhind tracks. One theoryis that this is due to the proportionally greaterweight in front tracks of bucks as a result of their more muscular front ends and antlers. The top trackers willmeasure either lengths or the widths to compare the tracks. Additionally, mature buck tracks tend to be larger than doe tracks, though due to the size variation in deer from region to region, there is no universal size cutoff and you must learn the sizes in your area.
Behavior and context are also valuable clues, but must be taken together with all the clues available to form a complete picture. If you find a large deer track, the front is quite a bit larger than the hind, and the animal is traveling alone through dense vegetation, it’s most likely a buck. Keep in mind that juvenile males can be easily mistaken for does and it’s best to reframe the question from “Is it a buck or doe?” to “Is it a mature buck or a doe/juvenile male?”
Hopefully this will inspire you to take a closer look at the deer tracks in your area. I’d be interested to hear your experiences. Do these techniques work for you? Are there other tricks you’ve found useful?